|
What's
ticked?
Accolades
Contact us
c o l u m n s
Cheap Charlie
ChrisCrossings
Err Travel
Leocha
Travel Notes
Archives
Like
what you see? Now you can become an
underwriter.
a l s o
Ticked e-mail
Visit Tripso
Referring sites
Home
s e a r c h
Find a story.
(c) Elliott Publishing.
|
|
Bravo,
JetBlue
Charles
Leocha · September
29, 2003
The
JetBlue privacy
violation is a perfect example of the media getting excited about
the wrong thing. The only violation that was committed by JetBlue was
a possible violation of their own privacy statement which notes, "The
financial and personal information collected on this site is not shared
with any third parties, and is protected by secure servers."
OK. Based on that sentence in the JetBlue privacy statement the high priests
of privacy have declared JetBlue a mortal sinner. That is not the case.
Holding JetBlue to the exact letter of that sentence would put it out
of business. Everyday, JetBlue shares information with third parties when
it sends passenger names and credit card numbers to VISA, MasterCard,
Diners Club and so on (third parties), in order to verify that those purchasing
tickets have enough credit to make the purchase.
Last April, I wrote about the new airline security
passenger database, known as CAPPS II.
JetBlue, in this latest flap, was being a good corporate citizen and doing
its best to protect its passengers. This is commendable and should be
rewarded rather than condemned. The biggest change needed for their privacy
policy is a statement that JetBlue "may share information with government
agencies under the laws of the United States."
When we are searching for information on people dedicated to doing us
harm, it is necessary to scan records of the innocent. Just as we, when
looking up a phone number in a telephone book, have access to thousands
of names, address and other phone numbers; the government must logically
scan all citizens in order to weed out the bad fruit.
Phone numbers in a public phone book are not violations of privacy. They
are a simple fact of life.
The concerns of the American people are not keeping data from legitimate
government efforts to ward off terrorism. The concerns of the American
people addressed in the JetBlue privacy policy were stated there to assure
Web site users that their personal information would not be used to generate
unwanted emails, phone spam and commercial propositions.
Unfortunately, the quaint notion of absolute privacy is a modern-day myth.
In this day of modern computers, the concept of privacy needs to be reexamined.
When enemies of the American people hide behind a cloak of privacy and
use our laws to do us harm, we need to rethink our official definitions
about privacy.
Some privacy is good. Some privacy is bad. Total privacy is unworkable
in our modern society.
Without information sharing (read this privacy violations), credit cards
could not be used, mortgages would not be issued, cash machines would
grind to a halt, frequent flier miles would disappear and income taxes
could not be efficiently collected.
We, as a country, have already given up bits and pieces of privacy to
make our lives easier. To be faced with an uproar from the Keepers of
Political Correctness when the government dares to collect information
already in the public domain in pursuit of villains is mind-boggling.
Commercial information sharing is what makes the economic engine of the
United States hum. The same kind of information sharing is needed for
our government.
It absurd that multiple driver's licenses can be issued across the country
with no database that can screen names across all state lines. It is foolish
to keep the CIA from speaking with the FBI, and keep the FBI from speaking
with local police. It is beyond comprehension that traffic cops writing
tickets have no nationwide system of knowing if the person driving is
wanted for theft, sex offenses, immigration violations or non-payment
of child support.
All this inefficiency while credit card companies can track your credit
card usage throughout the world with penny-by-penny accuracy. Something
is out of whack.
It seems that surrendering privacy in pursuit of profit is good. However,
surrendering privacy in pursuit of national security is bad.
This is a sad state. As a people, we are still sleeping in a la-la land
where business as usual creeps at its petty pace day by day. Unfortunately,
the world of today is not continuing on a business-as-usual basis. Americans
and our way of life are under attack. We as citizens must recognize this
and help those who are working to keep us secure rather than work to block
every step.
JetBlue should be commended for being a brave, forward-looking corporate
citizen. It should be recognized for putting the safety of passengers
first in its priorities. The airline industry should embrace the sharing
of passenger information and we as Americans must accept information sharing
as a fact of modern life that improves commerce and security, rather than
as an assault on privacy.
Charlie
Leocha is the Boston-based author of Travel
Rights: Know the Rules of the Road and the Air Before You Go. Cheap
Charlie appears every Monday on this site. E-mail him at leocha@aol.com
or access his Web site.
|
|
|