|
What's
ticked?
Accolades
Contact us
c o l u m n s
Cheap Charlie
ChrisCrossings
Err Travel
Leocha
Travel Notes
Archives
Like
what you see? Now you can become an
underwriter.
a l s o
Ticked e-mail
Visit Tripso
Referring sites
Home
s e a r c h
Find a story.
(c) Elliott Publishing.
|
|
Rats!
Err
Travel · August
22, 2000
Writing this week's
Err Travel column should have been an effortless task.
I read that the New York City Department
of Health had posted the inspection
records of all of the city's 19,000 restaurants on the Internet. What
could be easier for a smug Californian like me than to point out the hazards
of eating a big apple in the Big Apple? All I'd have to do was look up
a few of the city's more famous eateries on the Department's Web site,
note the violations, make a few acerbic remarks about rodents running
between the legs of diners at these establishments, and get back to my
day job.
That's what I had hoped. No such luck.
Look what I found when I looked up the first five famous restaurants that
popped into my stomach.
Danube - No violations. (Shoot!)
Russian Tea Room - Not listed. (Argh!)
Sardi's Restaurant - No violations. (Geez!)
Studio 54 - No violations (Rats!)
Tavern on the Green - Two violations: (1) "Hot food not held at
or above 140°F," and (2) "Food worker does not use a proper utensil to
eliminate bare hand contact with food that will not receive adequate additional
heat treatment." (Big deal.)
Okay, I needed another approach.
I'd pick the New York restaurants rated best for dining in Zagat's
Restaurant guide, look up their miserable ratings with the Department
of Health, throw in some sarcastic dialogue, then sign off. I'd call the
column, "Zagat and Gag It." Brilliant!
So I looked up restaurants again, this time using the seven highest rated
restaurants, all receiving an "extraordinary to perfection" in the Zagat
guide. Here are the results, sorted alphabetically. (As you can see, things
started out poorly for someone looking for problems.)
Aureole - No violations. (Uh-oh!)
Daniel - No violations. (Curses!)
Chanterelle - "Appropriately scaled metal stem-type thermometer
not provided or used to evaluate temperatures of hazardous foods during
cooking, cooling, reheating and holding." (Whoopty-do. A minor transgression
at worst.)
Jean Georges - "Milk or milk product undated, improperly dated
or expired." (Not much of an infraction.)
Then the picture changed.
Le Bernardin - "Vermin* or other live animal present in food storage,
preparation or service area." (Vermin? Now were talking.)
Nobu - "Vermin* or other live animal present in food storage, preparation
or service area." (Vermin again.)
Peter Luger Steak House - "Vermin* or other live animal present
in food storage, preparation or service area." (And again!)
Ah-ha! There you have it. Just as we artichoke and avocado left-coasters
would like to believe: PESTILENCE IS PANDEMIC IN NEW YORK CITY RESTAURANTS!
Okay, maybe that overstates the hazard since the Health Department defines
vermin as any
creature from a disease-carrying rat to an annoying fly. But what ticked-off
traveler would want to read: "Some New York restaurants have flies"?
Dr. Terry Riley is a psychologist and travel security
authority. His column appears on Wednesdays. He is author of the popular
book Travel Can Be Murder. Visit his site at http://www.appliedpsychology.com
or e-mail him at terry@ticked.com.
|
|
|