|
What's
ticked?
Accolades
Contact us
c o l u m n s
Cheap Charlie
ChrisCrossings
Err Travel
Leocha
Travel Notes
Archives
Like
what you see? Now you can become an
underwriter.
a l s o
Ticked e-mail
Visit Tripso
Referring sites
Home
s e a r c h
Find a story.
(c) Elliott Publishing.
|
|
Given the
Once-Over
ChrisCrossings · May 23, 2002
Q: On two recent
flights with Southwest Airlines I received complete baggage and body searches.
Apparently I match a profile because I made a reservation within three
days of travel, traveled on a one-way ticket, or changed my time of departure.
The latest security checks have been totally ineffective. On a flight
from Chicago to Cleveland everything was checked in my carry-on except
the computer pocket of the bag. During my inspection a federal examiner
walked up to watch the procedure. After I was inspected, I explained to
him what occurred and gave him my card. He told me I was selected (it
was not a randomized inspection) and concurred with me that I was meeting
the selection processes.
On another flight to Chicago I was checked because I had made the reservation
within 24 hours, moved the departure to an earlier flight, and it was
a one-way itinerary. This was an award ticket. During the inspection,
no one checked the pockets of my large ski style coat. If the checks are
to be done they need to be done right, or not at all.
I've written to Southwest about this problem. Is there anything else I
can do?
-- Andrew deLivron
A: Your assertion that the new security measures don't work is
correct. That's the conclusion of an undercover test of screeners at 32
U.S. airports conducted from November until February. In an internal memo
published recently, the Transportation Department's inspector general
reported widespread failures in most areas of airport security. Federal
security screeners allowed hundreds of guns, knives, or simulated explosives
through checkpoints-any of which could have potentially led to another
terrorist attack.
What can you do? You can vote. The new security precautions were put in
place by a government eager to leave the public with the false impression
that skies were safe from terrorism. Many of the steps they took were
misguided, reactionary, and foolish. Come November, you can vote them
out of office, not only for screwing up security, but also for blowing
the best chance in decades to reform a badly broken commercial aviation
system.
Even though this incident wasn't Southwest's fault since it doesn't control
the checkpoints, it rose to the occasion. It responded to your letter
by sending you vouchers for four free tickets. (Mental note: I should
send more letters to Southwest.) This was the most articulate response
any airline could make, a genuine "sorry" even though it wasn't the carrier's
mistake. I applaud Southwest for it.
I believe that Southwest, like a small group of other airlines that pays
attention to its customer feedback, is embarrassed by the new profiling
systems. Surely it knows that only the dumbest terrorists will buy a one-way
plane ticket on short notice, pay for it in cash, or change a reservation
at the last minute (three actions that would trigger an automatic search).
There's got to be a better way of checking for suspicious passengers,
and if Southwest is as smart as I think it is, then it's pressuring the
government for a real change even as I write this.
Christopher
Elliott's column appears on weekly on Ticked.com. All e-mailed questions
to ChrisCrossings become property of Ticked.com and may be edited, condensed
or republished at the site's discretion. You may reach Elliott at chris@ticked.com.
Or visit his home page at http://www.elliott.org.
|
|
|